In some parts of the world, interest rates have been negative, or mostly negative, for some time now. At one point in 2019, the total value of negative-yielding bonds globally was over $17 trillion. This was initially the result of explicit policies of setting negative interest rates by central banks in Japan and then Europe. But in 2020, amid fears of a deep recession caused by the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and the measures being enacted to control its spread, many global interest rates have dipped even lower. With most short-term U.S. interest rates close to zero now, can negative rates come to the United States … or have they already?
Why did some central banks implement negative rates?
If paying someone for the right to lend them money sounds crazy … it’s because it is! It upends our central understanding of economics.
The ultimate goal of negative rates was to stimulate economic growth. The theory is that lowering interest rates can encourage borrowing, which in turn funds increased economic activity. Simply lowering interest rates, even to zero, had not helped Japan and Europe meet their growth and inflation targets. So they resorted to negative rates to “force” banks to lend, and at much more attractive rates for companies.
Global central banks have also been managing large-scale bond-buying programs that have been driving down longer-term bond yields (sometimes into negative territory). This lowered the debt costs for businesses broadly, increasing their profitability and capacity to take on more debt. The hope was that management would use those higher profits and raise new capital to invest for growth. With a lower cost of capital, the hurdle rate to invest in new projects would now also be lower.
Have negative rates worked?
Unfortunately, setting negative short-term rates and buying large amounts of longer-term bonds has not stimulated the economies of Japan and Europe as hoped. There have been momentary green shoots of an economic rebound at times, but a number of factors may have made monetary stimulus less effective overseas:
Negative rates in the United States
Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell has stated quite strongly that they would not implement a negative interest rate policy here in the United States. But that statement was made before COVID-19.
For a moment during the recent market turbulence, the one- and three-month Treasury rates did move into negative territory, though this happened briefly once before a few years back. To be clear, this was not a result of a change in monetary policy. It most likely resulted from investors rushing to safety (i.e., to cash and cash equivalents) amid uncertainty around COVID-19. As the market has rebounded, these yields are now back in positive territory.
It’s important to recognize that the Fed only sets short-term interest rates, which they’ve now dropped close to zero. Markets still set all longer-term interest rates. The Fed can only influence longer-term interest rates indirectly through bond purchases. Though, in the wake of COVID-19, they have committed to purchase an unlimited amount of Treasury bonds, some corporate bonds, and even municipal bonds to keep borrowing costs down and ensure the fluid operation of lending and credit markets.
It’s still too early to say definitively that we will never resort to a negative interest rate policy in the United States or that rates set by markets won’t be influenced by speculation and turn negative again. But the Fed’s unprecedented actions seem to have instilled some level of confidence back into markets.
Our hope is that global monetary authorities and governments continue to work together to cushion the impact of an almost certain global recession; support markets, businesses, and citizens through this tough time; and do everything in their power to prevent a depression-like outcome.
—Litman Gregory Investment Team
Commentary from Our CIO—Second Quarter 2021
Global stock markets continued to surge in the second quarter. In our assessment of the macroeconomic backdrop and outlook, we continue to expect a strong global economic recovery over at least the next 12 months. In this quarterly commentary, our Chief Investment Officer, Jeremy DeGroot, reviews the current reasoning for our portfolio positioning, outlook on inflation, and forward-looking scenario analysis on the broader economy and markets.
Research Update: Increased Return Expectations for U.S. Stocks
As the economy and financial markets continue their recovery from the pandemic’s impact, our recent analysis resulted in improved expected returns for U.S. stocks. In this post we summarize our analysis and why we think an increased allocation to U.S. equities could benefit the risk-adjusted return profile of our portfolios.
Advisor Q&A: Tax Planning and the American Families Plan with Senior Advisor Chris Wheaton
The American Families Plan was recently released by President Joe Biden and includes many of the provisions outlined during his campaign. We asked Litman Gregory Senior Advisor, Chris Wheaton, to answer some questions about key proposed tax law changes, and related tax planning ideas for our clients to consider in 2021 and beyond.