Concerns have been swirling in the news headlines lately regarding the future of this financial reform legislation. Why? Since taking office, President Trump and Republicans in Congress have called for a repeal of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The legislation, passed in 2010, was aimed at better protecting consumers and addressing the risk of “too-big-to-fail” banks. Dodd-Frank’s major provisions include
A repeal of Dodd-Frank would have wide-ranging impacts, in both the short and long term. Yet, in reality, eliminating or even overhauling the multifaceted legislation can’t be done with the stroke of a pen and a flurry of executive orders. It would involve approval by multiple government agencies; the passage of new legislation by Congress that could gain the President’s signature, or withstand a veto; and mandatory public comment periods. Each step of the process would be subject to delays and protracted negotiation by multiple interest groups.
In short, this issue is likely to play out over years. We will certainly monitor developments, but it would be unusual for us to make changes to our portfolio positioning based on the possibility of deregulation within an individual industry or sector.
The Department of Labor’s (DoL) Fiduciary Rule had been scheduled to become effective in April 2017. This Obama administration rule requires advisors and broker/dealers who advise on retirement, ERISA assets, or IRA accounts to act in clients’ best interests and place clients’ needs before their own. However, last week, Trump signed a memorandum requiring the DoL to review the rule. While officially this only delays it, the action was widely interpreted as the first step to tabling it.
In terms of impact, as a registered investment advisor, Litman Gregory is already bound to a fiduciary standard. Putting clients’ interests ahead of our own is firmly embedded in our company’s DNA; nothing will change in the way we advise or interact with clients. The DoL rule was designed to ensure that, for the first time, others would be subject to fiduciary standards.
Financial stocks, especially those of big banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Goldman Sachs, initially jumped. The eventual outcome—repeal, rollback, or status quo—is highly uncertain though. While we don’t make calls on individual sectors, we’ve been cautious on U.S. stocks for quite some time, believing valuations are expensive relative to fundamentals and versus other regions’ equities. That makes them especially vulnerable to a negative surprise.
Do you have more questions or want to discuss the topics covered in this post? Please call your Litman Gregory Wealth Advisor or contact us here.
Chris Wheaton & Gretchen Hollstein Named as 2021 Forbes Best-in-State Wealth Advisors
We are thrilled to share that Litman Gregory Senior Advisors Chris Wheaton and Gretchen Hollstein have been named to the Forbes Best-in-State Wealth Advisors List for 2021.
Cryptocurrency Speculation: A Case of FOMO? (Fear of Missing Out)
Cryptocurrencies were back in the headlines throughout 2020 and into 2021, and some investors have found themselves wondering whether this type of investment deserves a role in portfolio construction. Our Research Team addresses the question, “Where do cryptocurrencies fit in?” and describes our approach to analyzing this type of investment.
Bitcoin’s Investment Merit
Litman Gregory's Research Team offers an update on this alternative investment option, encouraging investors to be cautious about buying cryptocurrencies. The team reviews the three broad elements in how we assess this investment: the underlying fundamentals and risks, Bitcoin’s price performance profile, and the behavioral aspects of owning bitcoin.