This year’s presidential race has generated more interest, expressions of concern, and questions from clients than any we can remember. Some want to know how the election impacts our investment views and how we might adjust our positioning in anticipation, while some have asked how we factor elections into our analysis and portfolio construction more generally.
First and foremost, we never try to bet on outcomes. What we do try to do, regardless of market or election cycle, is maintain an investment discipline that is long-term in focus, based on analyzing valuations and fundamentals, and that attempts to limit downside risk. Viewed through that lens, what are we watching, analyzing, and positioning for?
1. Market volatility
Along with sudden shocks (e.g., terrorist strikes), unexpected developments (such as the Brexit vote results), and lately, central bank actions, presidential elections can certainly drive short-term market swings. But the longer-term impact is a different story. The following chart from Ned Davis Research contains data on election cycles from 1900 through 2012. It shows that during presidential election years financial market swings have tended to be magnified in the final weeks of the campaign. This has been particularly true in years when the incumbent party lost. Once voting was over, markets have rallied going into year-end.
2. Economic fundamentals—long-term outlook
Over a full market cycle, returns are driven by fundamentals, not temporary shifts in investor sentiment, short-term momentum trading, flights to safety, or political rhetoric. While the U.S. economy could hardly be called robust, growth is positive, unemployment is down, and wages are up. Consumer spending is increasing, and confidence recently hit a 12-month high. None of these are likely to change overnight based on what happens in November. Yes, fiscal policy can impact all of them in the long-term, and there are important differences in the candidates’ policy stances, but presidents don’t get to decide these things in a vacuum. Without knowing which policy proposals will eventually be enacted, when, or how, making preemptive changes to portfolios is more likely to hurt than help.
3. Downside risk
It’s unclear how much markets are pricing in current polling data, but the election’s outcome could still turn out to be surprising. Even if market prices accurately reflect the results, how they would react over the short and longer terms is a different story. We are more focused on the impact of U.S. interest rates rising over the next several years. With the Federal Reserve and other central banks’ policies playing outsized roles in recent years—pushing stock prices higher and spurring bond yields to record lows—we see downside risks as they begin to pull back. We have already seen short-term spikes in yields push bond prices down and drive stock market swings in anticipation of rising interest rates. With the S&P 500 currently valued at a historically high earnings multiple (price-to-earnings ratio) that is not supported by strong corporate earnings trends, a rise in U.S. interest rates from their abnormally low levels is just one thing that could put downward pressure on prices.
Dealing with uncertainty
How do we deal with uncertainty? Whether election-driven or otherwise, we deal with it by not making sudden moves in or out of markets based on headlines. Instead, we develop and assess a range of scenarios, then construct diversified portfolios that are positioned to meet our clients’ longer-term goals, while minimizing the impact of temporary market falls.
While elections do matter, investing at reasonable valuations, balancing risk against potential reward, and not letting anxiety drive your decisions matter more.
Do you have more questions about the topics covered in this post? Call your Litman Gregory Investment Advisor or contact us here.
Commentary from Our CIO—Second Quarter 2021
Global stock markets continued to surge in the second quarter. In our assessment of the macroeconomic backdrop and outlook, we continue to expect a strong global economic recovery over at least the next 12 months. In this quarterly commentary, our Chief Investment Officer, Jeremy DeGroot, reviews the current reasoning for our portfolio positioning, outlook on inflation, and forward-looking scenario analysis on the broader economy and markets.
Research Update: Increased Return Expectations for U.S. Stocks
As the economy and financial markets continue their recovery from the pandemic’s impact, our recent analysis resulted in improved expected returns for U.S. stocks. In this post we summarize our analysis and why we think an increased allocation to U.S. equities could benefit the risk-adjusted return profile of our portfolios.
Advisor Q&A: Tax Planning and the American Families Plan with Senior Advisor Chris Wheaton
The American Families Plan was recently released by President Joe Biden and includes many of the provisions outlined during his campaign. We asked Litman Gregory Senior Advisor, Chris Wheaton, to answer some questions about key proposed tax law changes, and related tax planning ideas for our clients to consider in 2021 and beyond.