This year’s presidential race has generated more interest, expressions of concern, and questions from clients than any we can remember. Some want to know how the election impacts our investment views and how we might adjust our positioning in anticipation, while some have asked how we factor elections into our analysis and portfolio construction more generally.
First and foremost, we never try to bet on outcomes. What we do try to do, regardless of market or election cycle, is maintain an investment discipline that is long-term in focus, based on analyzing valuations and fundamentals, and that attempts to limit downside risk. Viewed through that lens, what are we watching, analyzing, and positioning for?
1. Market volatility
Along with sudden shocks (e.g., terrorist strikes), unexpected developments (such as the Brexit vote results), and lately, central bank actions, presidential elections can certainly drive short-term market swings. But the longer-term impact is a different story. The following chart from Ned Davis Research contains data on election cycles from 1900 through 2012. It shows that during presidential election years financial market swings have tended to be magnified in the final weeks of the campaign. This has been particularly true in years when the incumbent party lost. Once voting was over, markets have rallied going into year-end.
2. Economic fundamentals—long-term outlook
Over a full market cycle, returns are driven by fundamentals, not temporary shifts in investor sentiment, short-term momentum trading, flights to safety, or political rhetoric. While the U.S. economy could hardly be called robust, growth is positive, unemployment is down, and wages are up. Consumer spending is increasing, and confidence recently hit a 12-month high. None of these are likely to change overnight based on what happens in November. Yes, fiscal policy can impact all of them in the long-term, and there are important differences in the candidates’ policy stances, but presidents don’t get to decide these things in a vacuum. Without knowing which policy proposals will eventually be enacted, when, or how, making preemptive changes to portfolios is more likely to hurt than help.
3. Downside risk
It’s unclear how much markets are pricing in current polling data, but the election’s outcome could still turn out to be surprising. Even if market prices accurately reflect the results, how they would react over the short and longer terms is a different story. We are more focused on the impact of U.S. interest rates rising over the next several years. With the Federal Reserve and other central banks’ policies playing outsized roles in recent years—pushing stock prices higher and spurring bond yields to record lows—we see downside risks as they begin to pull back. We have already seen short-term spikes in yields push bond prices down and drive stock market swings in anticipation of rising interest rates. With the S&P 500 currently valued at a historically high earnings multiple (price-to-earnings ratio) that is not supported by strong corporate earnings trends, a rise in U.S. interest rates from their abnormally low levels is just one thing that could put downward pressure on prices.
Dealing with uncertainty
How do we deal with uncertainty? Whether election-driven or otherwise, we deal with it by not making sudden moves in or out of markets based on headlines. Instead, we develop and assess a range of scenarios, then construct diversified portfolios that are positioned to meet our clients’ longer-term goals, while minimizing the impact of temporary market falls.
While elections do matter, investing at reasonable valuations, balancing risk against potential reward, and not letting anxiety drive your decisions matter more.
Do you have more questions about the topics covered in this post? Call your Litman Gregory Investment Advisor or contact us here.
Our Perspective and Strategy During Turbulent Times
It’s been a difficult year, to say the least. As September comes to a close, we’ve weathered a disappointing month in the financial markets after a relatively benign August and a strong July. As is the case in any bear market, investors are braced for more to come. In this post we provide a summary on the forces that brought us here, how we’re responding, and what to expect going forward.
With Inflation Rising, Why Have Inflation-Protected Bonds Declined?
As the outlook for inflation turned less “transitory,” treasury inflation-protected securities became interesting to many investors. But these bonds have shown they aren’t immune to broader bond market declines, leaving investors to wonder, “How can my inflation-protected bonds be down when inflation is on the rise?” In this post we explain how these bonds are impacted by different market variables, including inflation, and why we believe they still deserve a place in our client portfolios.
I Savings Bonds Currently Offer a Generous Yield
With current yields over 9%, Series I Savings Bonds seem to offer a "free lunch". These bonds are issued by the U.S. Government and pay interest linked to current inflation rates, making them an attractive option for most savers and investors.